Sustainable Consumption and Worktime Reduction
By J. Schor. 2005
231 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba4a34530705b290bc37baa6f8b75b3520d81d91
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- F. Krausmann
- S. Giljum
- N. Eisenmenger
- Marina Fischer‐Kowalski
- H. Schandl
- Manfred Lenzen
- Martin Pullinger
- Jonas Nässén
Citations in the corpus
- Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review (2018, background): “Researchers from this field have investigated the environmental impacts of consumption [28] and the drivers of such forms of consumption including international trade [29] and societal conventions [30].”
- Would shorter working time reduce greenhouse gas emissions? An analysis of time use and consumption in Swedish households (2015, methodology): “Schor (2005) conducted a rudimentary analysis using data from eighteen OECD countries, linking national ecological footprints and average hours per employee, and found a significant positive correlation.”
- Mismatches Between Actual and Preferred Work Time: Empirical Evidence of Hours Constraints in 21 Countries (2010, background): “necessary requirement towards sustainability and improvement of individuals’ well-being ( Schor 2001, 2005 ).”
- Working time reduction policy in a sustainable economy: criteria and options for its design. (2014, background): “Structural factors tend to mean employers prefer long hours per employee and so resist working time reductions (Schor, 2005, pp. 43–45), and how to maximise the fit between the interests of employers and an accelerated programme of working time reduction is still an unsolved issue.”
- “Friday off”: Reducing Working Hours in Europe (2013, background): “For example, the excess of US labor productivity growth over hours change rose to a nearly four-decade high of 3.1% in the period 1995–2000 [19].”
- Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity: Forty Years of Evidence (2018, background): “2017), and a shift to shorter working hours, that is, compensating productivity gains with more free time to offset some of the rebound spending (Schor 2005).”
- Building a Sustainable and Desirable Economy-in-Society-in-Nature (2013, background): “Reduced working hours can also increase fl ourishing by improving the work/life balance, and there is evidence (Durning 1992; Schor 2005) that working fewer hours can reduce consumption-related environmental impacts.”