Extracting time‐domain Green's function estimates from ambient seismic noise

By Karim Sabra, Peter Gerstoft, Philippe Roux, William A. Kuperman, Michael Fehler. 2005

561 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba3f682be69894a148961c4202ac225716502b89

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Geophysics

Citations in the corpus

Processing seismic ambient noise data to obtain reliable broad-band surface wave dispersion measurements (2007, methodology): “, 2005) and long ambient noise sequences (Shapiro and Campillo, 2004; Sabra et al., 2005a) and for crustal body waves using ambient noise (Roux et al.”
Ambient noise Rayleigh wave tomography across Europe (2007, methodology): “Other researchers have used different methods; for example, Sabra et al. (2005b) used a truncation threshold for each station to clip seismograms.”
Global P, PP, and PKP wave microseisms observed from distant storms (2008, methodology): “It has recently been demonstrated that the surface wave based microseisms can be used to resolve Earth structure through ambient noise tomography methods, [e.g., Shapiro et al., 2005; Sabra et al., 2005; Courtland, 2008].”
Frequency‐Bessel Transform Method for Effective Imaging of Higher‐Mode Rayleigh Dispersion Curves From Ambient Seismic Noise Data (2019, background): “After the pioneering works of Aki (1957) and other researchers (e.g., Campillo & Paul, 2003; Derode et al., 2003; Lobkis & Weaver, 2001; Sabra et al., 2005a, 2005b; Sánchez-Sesma et al., 2011; Shapiro & Campillo, 2004; Shapiro et al., 2005; Snieder, 2004), once useless ambient noise data were…”
Tomography of the Alpine region from observations of seismic ambient noise (2009, methodology): “Note that compared to other studies (Shapiro & Campillo 2004; Sabra et al. 2005b; Shapiro et al. 2005; Yao et al. 2006; Yang et al. 2007), we did not apply any C© 2009 The Authors, GJI, 178, 338–350 Journal compilation C© 2009 RAS Downloaded from…”
Ambient noise Rayleigh wave tomography of New Zealand (2007, methodology): “, 2005) and ambient noise for surface waves (Shapiro and Campillo, 2004; Sabra et al., 2005a) and crustal body waves (Roux et al.”
Assessment of resolution and accuracy of the Moving Window Cross Spectral technique for monitoring crustal temporal variations using ambient seismic noise (2011, methodology): “…the cross-correlation of records of a random seismic wave field taken at various locati ns within a region of interest ⋆ MWCS: assessment of resolution and accuracy3 (Weaver & Lobkis 2001; Lobkis & Weaver 2001; Campillo & Paul 2003; Shapiro & Campillo 2004; Shapiro et al. 2005; Sabra et al. 2005).”
Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 1 — Basic principles and applications (2010, methodology): “To stay focussed on seismic applications, we refrain from a further discussion of the normal-mode approach, nor do we discuss the many interesting applications of Green’s function retrieval in underwater acoustics (e.g. Roux and Fink (2003), Sabra et al. (2005c), Brooks and Gerstoft (2007)).”
Traveltime measurements from noise correlation: stability and detection of instrumental time-shifts (2007, background): “The emergence of the Green’s function is effective only after a sufficient averaging that is provided by random spatial distribution of the noise sources when considering long time-series as well as the scattering of seismic waves on heterogeneities within the Earth crust (Shapiro & Campillo 2004; ”
Improved ambient noise correlation functions using Welch's method (2012, methodology): “The result of days, months or years of stacked correlation is often called a noise correlation function (NCF; e.g. Roux et al. 2005; Sabra et al. 2005).”
Seismic interferometry by crosscorrelation and by multidimensional deconvolution: a systematic comparison (2010, background): “The main underlying assumptions are that the medium is lossless and that the wave field is equipartitioned, meaning that the net powerflux is (close to) zero (Malcolm et al. 2004; Sánchez-Sesma et al. 2006).”
P‐waves from cross‐correlation of seismic noise (2005, methodology): “Lett., 32, L19303, doi:10.1029/2005GL023803.”