Effects of low and high nutrients on the competitive hierarchy of 26 shoreline plants

By P. Keddy, C. Gaudet, L. Fraser. 2000

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba2968b61cfb6dc1e82e153a664cd675362c54f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Rapid Evolutionary Change and the Coexistence of Species (2011, background): “Although plant communities typically show transitive hierarchies at the species level (Keddy & Shipley 1989, Keddy et al. 2000), intransitive dynamics can develop between specific genotypes of competing species (Lankau & Strauss 2007, Taylor & Aarssen 1990).”
Identifying mechanisms of competition in multi‐species communities (2007, methodology): “In experimental ecology, inferences from simple pairwise competition experiments towards strict competitive hierarchies of species in natural multispecies communities are common (Keddy & Shipley 1989; Keddy et al. 1994, 1998, 2000; Roxburgh & Wilson 2000a,b) and apart from a few exceptions (Fowler”
Warming changes plant competitive hierarchy in a temperate steppe in northern China (2008, background): “Warming changes species competitive hierarchy Species competitive ability could be ordered into competitive hierarchy, which has been reported in the previous studies (Keddy et al. 2000; Miller and Werner 1987).”
Reconciling plant strategy theories of Grime and Tilman (2005, background): “He hypothesized that the species that had the higher relative growth rate in monoculture at a given resource supply ratio would be the better competitor at that ratio of supplies.”
Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? (2007, background): “1998), in particular because species competitive rankings are sensitive to nutrient availability (Keddy et al. 2000), disturbance (Suding & Goldberg 2001), and to mycorrhizal associations (van der Heijden et al.”
Indices of plant competition (2003, background): “…Foster 2000; Tielbörger & Kadmon 2000b; Zamfir & Goldberg 2000; Greiner la Peyre et al. 2001; Peltzer & Köchy 2001; Peltzer 2001; Facelli & Facelli 2002; Fowler 2002), and when expressed as a percentage this index was termed relative competitive performance (Cpi, nr. 4, Keddy et al. 1998, 2000).”
Does phylogenetic relatedness influence the strength of competition among vascular plants (2008, background): “By combining measures of competitive ability (Table 1; Gaudet and Keddy, 1995; Rösch et al., 1997a; Keddy et al., 1998, 2000, 2002) with phylogenetic distances among species based on molecular phylogenies including those species, we are able to provide the first comparative test involving large…”