Protecting Locations with Differential Privacy under Temporal Correlations

By Yonghui Xiao, Li Xiong. Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2014

404 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Concerns on location privacy frequently arise with the rapid development of GPS enabled devices and location-based applications. While spatial transformation techniques such as location perturbation or generalization have been studied extensively, most techniques rely on syntactic privacy models without rigorous privacy guarantee. Many of them only consider static scenarios or perturb the location at single timestamps without considering temporal correlations of a moving user's locations, and hence are vulnerable to various inference attacks. While differential privacy has been accepted as a standard for privacy protection, applying differential privacy in location based applications presents new challenges, as the protection needs to be enforced on the fly for a single user and needs to incorporate temporal correlations between a user's locations. In this paper, we propose a systematic solution to preserve location privacy with rigorous privacy guarantee. First, we propose a new definition, "δ-location set" based differential privacy, to account for the temporal correlations in location data. Second, we show that the well known l1-norm sensitivity fails to capture the geometric sensitivity in multidimensional space and propose a new notion, sensitivity hull, based on which the error of differential privacy is bounded. Third, to obtain the optimal utility we present a planar isotropic mechanism (PIM) for location perturbation, which is the first mechanism achieving the lower bound of differential privacy. Experiments on real-world datasets also demonstrate that PIM significantly outperforms baseline approaches in data utility.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba231bd280bf2c0bf2e337d2b2405df8901aace1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. John M. Abowd
  2. Ashwin Machanavajjhala
  3. Lars Vilhuber
  4. Mark J. Kutzbach
  5. Matthew Graham
  6. Samuel Haney
  7. Hien To
  8. Cyrus Shahabi

In Computer Science Applications

  1. Ashwin Machanavajjhala
  2. John M. Abowd
  3. Hien To
  4. Cyrus Shahabi
  5. Kamalika Chaudhuri

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. John M. Abowd
  2. Ashwin Machanavajjhala
  3. Lars Vilhuber
  4. Mark J. Kutzbach
  5. Hien To
  6. Cyrus Shahabi
  7. Kien Nguyen
  8. Kamalika Chaudhuri

Citations in the corpus