Revised equipartition and minimum energy formula for magnetic field strength estimates from radio synchrotron observations

By Rainer Beck, M. Krause. 2005

308 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The commonly used classical equipartition or minimum-energy estimate of total magnetic fields strengths from radio synchrotron intensities is of limited practical use because it is based on the hardly known ratio K of the total energies of cosmic ray protons and electrons and also has inherent problems. We present a revised formula, using the number density ratio K for which we give estimates. For particle acceleration in strong shocks K is about 40 and increases with decreasing shock strength. Our revised estimate for the field strength gives larger values than the classical estimate for flat radio spectra with spectral indices of about 0.5–0.6, but smaller values for steep spectra and total fields stronger than about 10 µG. In very young supernova remnants, for example, the classical estimate may be too large by up to 10×. On the other hand, if energy losses of cosmic ray electrons are important, K increases with particle energy and the equipartition field may be underestimated significantly. Our revised larger equipartition estimates in galaxy clusters and radio lobes are consistent with independent estimates from Faraday rotation measures, while estimates from the ratio between radio synchrotron and X-ray inverse Compton intensities generally give much weaker fields. This may be explained e.g. by a concentration of the field in filaments. Our revised field strengths may also lead to major revisions of electron lifetimes in jets and radio lobes estimated from the synchrotron break frequency in the radio spectrum. (© 2005 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba139926f678c51107234d42d827741e5ad80110

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. E. Quataert
  3. Robert C. Kennicutt Jr.
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. T. Thompson
  6. Mark R. Krumholz
  7. D. Calzetti
  8. D. Dale

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. E. Quataert
  2. T. Thompson
  3. Kumiko Kotera
  4. Rainer Beck
  5. N. Murray
  6. Hyesung Kang
  7. Angela V. Olinto
  8. M. Brüggen

Citations in the corpus