Statistical Procedures for Forecasting Criminal Behavior
By Richard A. Berk, Justin Bleich. 2013
162 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Cynthia Rudin
- Berk Ustun
- Jiaming Zeng
- G. Barnes
- Justin Bleich
- Cho-Jui Hsieh
- Richard A. Berk
- Jianbo Chen
In Epidemiology
- Cynthia Rudin
- Berk Ustun
- Jiaming Zeng
- G. Barnes
- Adam Kapelner
- Richard A. Berk
- Justin Bleich
- Michael I. Jordan
In Sociology and Political Science
- Richard A. Berk
- Cynthia Rudin
- Berk Ustun
- Jiaming Zeng
- G. Barnes
- Justin Bleich
- Adam Kapelner
- Susan B. Sorenson
In Statistics and Probability
- Cynthia Rudin
- Berk Ustun
- Jiaming Zeng
- Richard A. Berk
- Justin Bleich
- G. Barnes
- Adam Kapelner
- E. Pitkin
In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
- Cynthia Rudin
- Berk Ustun
- Jiaming Zeng
- Justin Bleich
- G. Barnes
- Adam Kapelner
- Richard A. Berk
- John Danaher
Citations in the corpus
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI (2019, neutral): “Finally, CERTI-FAI (Counterfactual Explanations for Robustness, Transparency, Inter-pretability, and Fairness of Artificial Intelligence models) [402] uses a customized genetic algorithm to generate counterfactuals that can help to see the robustness of a ML model, generate explanations, and examine ”
- Peeking Inside the Black Box: Visualizing Statistical Learning With Plots of Individual Conditional Expectation (2013, background): “Berk and Bleich (2013) demonstrated the advantage of using RF and the associated PDPs to accurately model predictor-response relationships under asymmetric classification costs that often arise in criminal justice settings.”
- Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art (2017, neutral): “…been ongoing discussions about how much better in practice risk assessments derived from machine learning perform compared to risk assessments derived from older, conventional methods (Berk 2012; Berk and Bleich 2013; Brennan and Oliver 2013; Liu et al. 2011; Rhodes 2013; Ridgeway 2013a, 2013b).”
- Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction (2015, methodology): “This discussion is captured nicely by Bushway (2013), who described a discrepancy between papers of Berk and Bleich (2013) and Tollenaar and van der Heijden (2013).”
- Using Regression Kernels to Forecast A Failure to Appear in Court (2014, methodology): “The experience comparing logistic regression to machine learning is similar (Berk and Bleich, 2013).”
- Forecasting Domestic Violence: A Machine Learning Approach to Help Inform Arraignment Decisions (2016, background): “For violent street crimes, the ages of highest risk are the late teens and early 20s, after which the risk of perpetration drops dramatically (Berk & Bleich 2013).”
- Sacrificing Accuracy for Transparency in Recidivism Risk Assessment: The Impact of Classification Method on Predictive Performance (2016, background): “Finally, Berk and Bleich (2013) reported their machine learning model, based on Random Forests, signi fi cantly outperformed logistic regression.”
- Greedy Attack and Gumbel Attack: Generating Adversarial Examples for Discrete Data (2018, background): “Robustness to adversarial perturbation has become an extremely important criterion for applications of machine learning in security-sensitive domains such as spam detection [25], fraud detection [6], criminal justice [3], malware detection [13], and financial markets [27].”