Disenfranchised Grief: New Directions, Challenges, and Strategies for Practice

By K. Doka. 2002

714 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba08886b5766c0f8a0459db671c87d971658e466

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. R. Neimeyer
2. Holly Gwen Prigerson
3. B. Davies.
4. C. Hall
5. Crystal L. Park
6. J. Gillies
7. D. Larson
8. R. Tedeschi

Citations in the corpus

• Disenfranchised Grief Revisited: Discounting Hope and Love (2004, neutral): “In his second anthology (Doka, 2002), he added two other categories: 4.”
• Bereavement theory: recent developments in our understanding of grief and bereavement (2014, background): “Doka KJ (ed) (2002). Disenfranchised grief: new directions, challenges, and strategies for practice.”
• Mourning and Meaning (2002, background): “An important caveat is in order here, however, insofar as many losses (e.g., the death of an unborn child, of an extramarital lover, and of an ex-partner) are socially disenfranchised, receiving little or no ritual support in contemporary culture (Doka, 2002; Neimeyer & Jordan, 2002).”