Economic performance of pyrolysis of mixed plastic waste: Open-loop versus closed-loop recycling

By Macarena Larrain, Steven Van Passel, G. Thomassen, Uros Kresovic, N. Alderweireldt, E. Moerman, P. Billen. 2020

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract In recent decades new recycling technologies for mixed plastic waste have emerged. In pyrolysis, the polymer chains are thermally broken (pyrolyzed) to obtain hydrocarbon materials of different molecular weights such as naphtha, oil or waxes, whose yields can be controlled by varying the reaction parameters. Naphtha represents a closed-loop recycling process as it is a feedstock for (poly)olefins; while the co-production of waxes, having several applications in e.g. the construction industry, exemplifies an open-loop recycling process. This paper compares the economic performance of the pyrolysis of mixed polyolefin waste in a closed-loop and open-loop scheme, including a probabilistic approach to the most important variables. From an economic perspective, open-loop pyrolysis as presented outperforms closed-loop recycling, due to the high prices of wax. However, the results present a high dispersion caused by the volatility of the prices of crude oil and its derivates. Considering the current oil price projections, our case study analysis showed that for open-loop recycling there is a future probability of almost a 98% of observing positive results and around 57% of probability in the case of closed-loop recycling, under the assumptions made. Yet, in a future scenario where decarbonized electricity would decrease oil prices, the probability of a positive outcome reduces to 57% for the open-loop case and to less than 8% in the case of closed-loop recycling. To make these pathways attractive to investors, the nameplate capacity should be at least 70 kt/year for open-loop recycling and 115 kt/year for closed-loop recycling. A 120 kt/year plant should operate minimally at 80% of its capacity for open-loop recycling, while closed-loop recycling would demand running close to maximum capacity. Security of feedstock supply therefore is required.

Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pollution, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9e9e2f812987bdf2476319abe5f4b082ea56e10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Arkajyoti Shome
  2. Rakesh Kumar
  3. Pawan Kumar
  4. Anurag Verma
  5. Ritesh Kumar
  6. Rama Sinha
  7. Shubham
  8. Shreya Das

Citations in the corpus