Phonological Augmentation in Prominent Positions
By Jennifer L. Smith. 2004
224 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Acknowledgements Chapter 1: Positional Augmentation: Markedness Constraints for Prominent Positions Chapter 2: A Theory of Positional Augmentation Constraints Chapter 3: Augmentation of Phonetically Strong Positions Chapter 4: Augmentation of Psycholinguistically Strong Positions Chapter 5: Positional Augmentation and Positional Neutralization Chapter 6: Conclusions, Implications, and Future Directions Bibliography Index
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9e45ea351ce2696f21c1132505bbd6a4d5f3483
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Joe Pater
- John J. McCarthy
- Philippe Ségéral
- Tobias Scheer
- R. Meşter
- John Alderete
- Bruce Morén
- Paul Smolensky
In Language and Linguistics
- Joe Pater
- John J. McCarthy
- Philippe Ségéral
- Tobias Scheer
- R. Meşter
- John Alderete
- KevinM . Ryan
- Jeffrey Heinz
Citations in the corpus
- OT constraints are categorical (2003, unknown): “Like other constraint schemata in the literature (e.g. McCarthy & Prince 1993a, Smolensky 1995, Eisner 1999, Baković & Wilson 2000, Wilson 2000, 2001, Potts & Pullum 2002, Smith 2002), this one does not obviate the need for other formal or substantive limits on what constraints are possible.”
- The gradual path to cluster simplification* (2008, background): “(8) HavePlace (after Padgett 1995, Parker 2001, Smith 2002) The gradual path to cluster simplification 279 All of the constraint rankings necessary for harmonic improvement in < pat.ka, paH.ka, pa.ka > are summarised in (9).”
- The Coda Mirror, stress and positional parameters (2008, background): “This is true even for specialised work on fortition (Smith 2002, 2004).”
- Effects of Word Position and Stress on Onset Cluster Production: Evidence from Typical Development, Specific Language Impairment, and Dyslexia (2009, unknown): “Whether the contrast between strong and weak positions is due to perception and/or production, or is strictly grammatical, is subject to debate (Smith 2004).”
- Weighted Constraints in Generative Linguistics (2009, background): “, articulation and perception), there have been several proposals in OT for induction of the constraints from phonetics (e.g., Flack, 2007; Hayes, 1999; Smith, 2002).”