Tourism Carrying Capacity: Tempting Fantasy or Useful Reality?
By S. McCool, D. Lime. 2001
469 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9e1def5a990fcfc892c493c7f5197326bd69a45
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
In Transportation
Citations in the corpus
- Is Overtourism Overused? Understanding the Impact of Tourism in a City Context (2018, background): “The main issue is its focus on tourism numbers, which brings with it that negative effects are equated with mass tourism or increasing visitor numbers [14].”
- Picking up litter: an application of theory-based communication to influence tourist behaviour in protected areas (2010, background): “There is abundant research to show that all types of recreational activity can cause environmental degradation, even at low use levels ( Hammitt & Cole, 1998 ; Liddle, 1997 ), and that visitor behaviour and visitor density levels can influence the quality of the visitor experience ( Manning, 2007 ;”
- Empowerment and resident support for tourism in rural Central and Eastern Europe (CEE): the case of Pomerania, Poland (2017, background): “…by it, through increased economic opportunity, preservation of the local community’s cultural and natural heritage, and an enhanced quality of life” (McCool & Lime, 2001, p. 385) The sustainable tourism literature takes this emphasis on economic development a step further and asserts that…”
- Residents’ Attitudes towards Overtourism from the Perspective of Tourism Impacts and Cooperation–The Case of Ljubljana (2019, background): “Numerous tourism ‘kinds’ and concepts have been developed to address tourism’s negative impacts almost 50 years ago; such as the book titled Tourism, Blessing or Blight [6], Doxey’s irritation index [7], Butler’s destination life cycle [8], tourism social costs to destinations [9], limits of accepta”
- Sustainable Tourism Development: A Critique (2003, background): “Therefore, the primary question underlying carrying capacity should not be ‘howmany is toomany?’ but rather determining howmany changes to environmental conditions are acceptable given the development objectives of a destination (McCool & Lime, 2001).”
- Conceptualizing yield: Sustainable Tourism Management (2006, background): “At a certain point, changes to the resource pool may fall short of or exceed the limits defined by stakeholders (Bosselman, Peterson and McCarthy 1999; McCool and Lime 2001).”