Evaluation of an acoustic telemetry transmitter designed to identify predation events

By E. Halfyard, D. Webber, J. D. Papa, T. Leadley, S. Kessel, S. Colborne, A. Fisk. 2017

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9bfdebdfcd560aea28b6cc24c45f8adca83e390

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. G. Raby
2. J. Brownscombe
3. S. Cooke
4. L. Gutowsky
5. C. Krueger
6. C. Suski
7. Frederic Bartumeus

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. G. Raby
2. J. Brownscombe
3. S. Cooke
4. Daniel P. Struthers
5. K. J. Murchie
6. L. Gutowsky
7. C. Krueger
8. M. Stokesbury

Citations in the corpus

• Conducting and interpreting fish telemetry studies: considerations for researchers and resource managers (2019, background): “There are also acoustic tags available that have integrated pH sensors that detect predator stomach acids and alter signal characteristics to indicate predation (Halfyard et al. 2017).”
• Living until proven dead: addressing mortality in acoustic telemetry research (2020, background): “Similarly, the recent advent of predation tags has enabled researchers to more definitively identify predation events (Halfyard et al. 2017) leading to more accurate survival estimates (Daniels et al.”