Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews
By Quenby, Jørgensen. 2017
324 citations recorded by the source corpus.
abstracts can be used to eliminate clearly irrelevant reports, obviating the need to obtain the full text of those reports or to return to the bibliographic database at a later time. Accession number/Unique identifier: it is advisable to set aside an unused field for storing the Unique Identifier/Accession Number of records downloaded, such as the ERIC number (EJ or ED). This allows subsequent linkage to the full database record and also facilitates information management such as duplicate detection and removal. Affiliation/address: may include the institutional affiliation and / or e-mail address of the author(s). Article identifier/Digital object identifier (DOI): should be used to cite and link to the full record.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b99b333d8c688c739699ed11f0fa2bf63ff6cb95
Citations in the corpus
- Can At-Risk Youth Be Diverted From Crime? (2016, unknown): “Using the Campbell Collaboration’s guidelines (Hammerstrom, Wade, & Jorgenson, 2010), a comprehensive search strategy using multiple synonyms and defining terms was developed and refined, with a primary goal of identifying all potential candidate program evaluations and a secondary goal of…”
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (2021, unknown): “Database limits are not recommended for use in systematic reviews, due to their fallibility [38, 100].”
- Promoting Educators’ Use of Culturally Responsive Practices: A Systematic Review of Inservice Interventions (2018, unknown): “Step 3: Developing and Documenting the Search Strategy We developed a written protocol to ensure a comprehensive and replicable search strategy, adhering to detailed information retrieval guidelines given by the Campbell Collaboration (Hammerstrøm et al., 2010).”
- Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies (2018, unknown): “The number of duplicates identified [10], the screening decisions [3], a comprehensive list of grey literature sources searched (and full detail for other supplementary search methods) [8], and an annotation of search terms tested but not used [4] were identified as unique items in four documents.”
- A Systematic Review of the Effects of Schoolwide Intervention Programs on Student and Teacher Perceptions of School Climate (2020, unknown): “Study Identification The search terms were identified using a three-step process consistent with the Campbell Collaboration guide on conducting systematic reviews (Hammerstrom et al., 2010).”