Distribution and Development: A New Look at the Developing World
By Gary S. Fields. 2001
483 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b999e26e89b5c86da7529e3e0784ec7e1e07842a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- E. Thorbecke
- James E. Foster
- François Bourguignon
- M. Ravallion
- Leonardo Gasparini
- J. Greer
- Facundo Alvaredo
- Peter Lanjouw
Citations in the corpus
- Does income mobility equalize longer-term incomes? New measures of an old concept (2010, background): “The various mobility concepts are discussed in Atkinson, Bourguignon, and Morrisson (1992), Maasoumi (1998), Fields and Ok (1999a), and Morgan (2005), among others, and are distinguished in Fields (2001, 2008).”
- Culture and Public Action (2004, background): “There is a significant literature in economics on mobility; see Fields (2001) for a discussion; and Bowles and Gintis (2002) for a review.”
- Macroeconomic Adjustment and the Poor : Analytical Issues and Cross-Country Evidence (2002, background): “2See Fields (2001) and Ravallion (1994) for a discussion of this measure of poverty, as well as the poverty gap (discussed later), and their limitations.”
- Social protection and poverty (2011, background): ““Resourcist” perspectives define poverty as “the inability of an individual or family to command sufficient resources to satisfy basic needs” (Fields 2001:73).”
- The pattern of growth and poverty reduction in China (2009, background): “2 A partial list of contributions includes World Bank (1990, 2000), Ravallion (1995, 2001), Ravallion and Chen (1997), Fields (2001) and Kraay (2006).”
- The growth elasticity of poverty reduction : explaining heterogeneity across countries and time periods (2002, methodology): “…that only half of the observed changes in poverty in the sample may be explained by economic growth, the remaining half being the result of changes in the 3 See also the presentation of that methodology in the short literature survey provided by Fields (2001) 4 distribution of relative incomes.”
- Recent trends in inequality and poverty in developing countries (2013, background): “…relationship between development and inequality is the subject of a large literature that has to face numerous empirical challenges, and hence it is far from settled (see Anand and Kanbur, 1993; Fields, 2002; Banerjee and Duflo, 2003; Dominics et al., 2008; and Voitchovsky, 2009 for assessments).”
- Financial Sector Development, Economic Growth, and Poverty Reduction: A Literature Review (2009, background): “Fields (2001) argues that much would be gained by developing credit and finance markets since an underdeveloped credit market contributes to continued poverty, higher income inequality, and slower economic growth.”
- Determinants of Income Mobility and Household Poverty Dynamics in South Africa (2005, unknown): “Jarvis and Jenkins, 1997), but also higher than in rural China between 1978 and 1983, Malaysia between 1967 and 1976, and Peru in the 1980s and 1990s (Fields, 2001).”
- Escaping Poverty and Becoming Poor: Who Gains, Who Loses, and Why? (2004, background): “1. ‘‘Usually but hardly always, economic growth reduces absolute poverty,’’ asserts Fields (2001, p. 104) , and the aggregate relationship between growth and poverty redu ction at the national level can hide several discrepancies that appear when lower-level results are examined.”
- Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalization? (2008, unknown): “14For a comprehensive review of the empirical literature testing Kuznets’ hypothesis see Fields (2001) and for a recent contribution using cross-country panel estimation, similar to this paper, see Angeles (2010).”
- Describing and decomposing post-apartheid income inequality in South Africa (2012, background): “It is this picture of inequality dominance that allows us to conclude definitively that the distribution of income in 2008 was more unequal than was the case in 1993 (Fields, 2001).”