Stoichiometric variation in C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios of littoral benthic invertebrates

By A. Liess, H. Hillebrand. Journal of The North American Benthological Society, 2005

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b993b77747761582b2d00bcfa7e01ffd2965eba3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Benstead
2. W. Cross
3. S. Thomas
4. P. Frost
5. Alexander S. Flecker
6. G. Woodward

In Environmental Chemistry

1. J. Benstead
2. W. Cross
3. Peter McIntyre
4. S. Thomas
5. P. Frost
6. Alexander S. Flecker

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Benstead
2. W. Cross
3. Peter McIntyre
4. S. Thomas
5. P. Frost
6. Alexander S. Flecker
7. G. Woodward

Citations in the corpus

• Ecological Stoichiometry as an Integrative Framework in Stream Fish Ecology (2010, background): “, Lotka 1925; Redfield 1958), its exploration was largely limited to plant and phytoplankton ecology until two decades ago. In the mid-1980s, a seminal essay by Reiners (1986) laid out the framework for using elemental analyses to understand patterns and processes at scales from organisms to the bio”
• Ecological stoichiometry in freshwater benthic systems: recent progress and perspectives (2005, background): “However, several studies have reported negative correlations between consumer body size and P content, which could be related to differences in growth rate given that small-bodied animals tend to grow faster (Cross et al., 2003; Evans- White et al., 2005; Liess & Hillebrand, 2005).”