Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II.
By Sunghyun Nam, Alfred D. French, B. Condon, Monica C. Concha. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2016
642 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomaterials, Building and Construction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b98275274013aae371a7dd460212c3fa54db8659
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomaterials
In Building and Construction
Citations in the corpus
- Comparison of sample crystallinity determination methods by X-ray diffraction for challenging cellulose I materials (2016, methodology): “Method 3: Gaussian peak fitting with a linear background (Gaussian? linear) Method 3 includes a larger scattering angle region (from 2h1 ¼ 13 to 2h2 ¼ 50 ) than method 2 and correspondingly more reflections (18 reflections of cellulose Ib (Nishiyama et al. 2002)).”
- Utilization of pineapple peel for production of nanocellulose and film application (2018, methodology): “In order to evaluate the crystallinity of the obtained fibres, the crystallinity index (CrI) was calculated by the following Segal equation (Nam et al. 2016): CrIð%Þ ¼ I200 Iam I200 100 where I200 is the maximum intensity of the (200) diffractionpeak for cellulose Ib at 2h = 22.5 and Iam is the…”
- Comparative study of cellulosic components isolated from different Eucalyptus species (2018, methodology): “(3) (Nam et al. 2016).”