Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications
By Weikai Yan, Nicholas A. Tinker. 2006
1,388 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b96c2bd21d691fe9136aa6c3e20870add02ae17e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
In Plant Science
- Jose Crossa
- Juan Burgueño
- P. Cornelius
- Weikai Yan
- R. Mohammadi
- Rong‐Cai Yang
- Jim Holland
- Kuang Hongyu
Citations in the corpus
- GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of barley yield performance in Iran (2017, background): “According to described recommendation by Yan and Tinker (2006), an ideal genotype should have both high mean yield and high stability within a mega-environment.”
- Integrating different stability models to investigate genotype × environment interactions and identify stable and high-yielding barley genotypes (2019, background): “(Yan et al. 2001). The principles of GGE biplots were reviewed by Yan and Tinker (2006). Both numerical and graphical models show G and GEI effects from METs that help to evaluate genotypes and identify mega-environments (Dehghani et al.”
- GGE biplot analysis of genotype × environment interaction in wheat-barley disomic addition lines. (2012, background): “This line (EI1-axis) is called the axis for this environment (Yan and Tinker, 2006) and along it is the ranking of genotypes.”
- Biplot Analysis of Genotype × Environment Interaction: Proceed with Caution (2009, methodology): “Recent reviews (Yan and Tinker, 2006; Gauch, 2006; Yan et al., 2007; Gauch et al., 2008) have described in detail two kinds of biplots for the analysis of a two-way GE matrix from the MET data.”
- Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interactions (AMMI) and genotype by environment interaction (GGE) biplot analyses aid selection of high yielding and adapted finger millet varieties (2014, background): “Therefore, high yielding and relatively stable genotypes can be considered as references for genotype evaluation (Yan and Tinker, 2006).”
- AMMI and GGE Biplot for genotype × environment interaction: a medoid–based hierarchical cluster analysis approach for high–dimensional data (2018, methodology): “This difference is the main topic of discussion among authors concerned with the effectiveness of the two models in depicting adaptive responses of genotypes over environments (Yan and Tinker, 2005; Gauch, 2006; Yan and Tinker, 2006; Yan et. al., 2007; Gauch et al., 2008).”
- Diallel analysis of grain yield and resistance to seven diseases of 12 African maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines (2010, background): “Also, H39 was close to the ideal genotype described by Yan and Tinker (2006) because it had high yield (large PC1) and was stable across environments (PC2 near zero).”
- Specific adaptation of barley varieties in different locations in Ethiopia (2009, methodology): “Once the target regions are clariWed, the knowledge of GEI can reduce the cost of extensive genotype evaluation by eliminating unnecessary testing sites and by Wne-tuning breeding programs (Yan and Tinker 2006).”
- A heritability-adjusted GGE biplot for test environment evaluation (2010, background): “Interpretation of the angle between two environment vectors in different GGE biplot When the GGE biplot has a perfect goodness of fit, the cosine of the angle (ajj0) between two environments is the genetic correlation between them (Gabriel 1971; Kroonenberg 1995; Yan and Tinker 2006): rgðjj0Þ 1⁄4 co”
- AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analysis for matching varieties onto soybean production environments in Ethiopia (2009, methodology): “The SREG GGE model is a multiplicative model that absorbs the main effects of genotypes plus the environment interaction which are the two important factors in variety selection (Yan et al., 2000; Yan and Tinker, 2006).”
- GGE Biplot vs. AMMI Analysis of Genotype-by-Environment Data (2007, methodology): “When supplemental information (e.g., data on environmental or genotypic covariates) is available, a fourth aspect, which is to understand the causes of G and GE, can be included (Yan and Hunt, 2001; Yan and Kang, 2003; Yan and Tinker , 2005b, 2006).”