One Venue, Two Conferences: The Separation of Chinese and American Citation Networks

By Bingchen Zhao, Yuling Gu, Jessica Zosa Forde, Naomi Saphra. 2022

3 citations recorded by the source corpus.

At NeurIPS, American and Chinese institutions cite papers from each other's regions substantially less than they cite endogamously. We build a citation graph to quantify this divide, compare it to European connectivity, and discuss the causes and consequences of the separation.

Subfields: Statistics and Probability, Graph Learning, Social Sciences & Humanities

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

1. Ari Holtzman
2. Alex Wang
3. Samuel R. Bowman
4. Julian Michael
5. Aaron Mueller
6. Divyam Madaan

In Social Sciences & Humanities

1. Alex Wang
2. Samuel R. Bowman

Citations in the corpus

• What Do NLP Researchers Believe? Results of the NLP Community Metasurvey (2022, background): “It’s worth noting that Zhao et al. (2022) describe a significant disconnect between the US and Chinese ML communities (at least in terms of their citation networks).”