Classical command of quantum systems

386 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Private quantum computation: an introduction to blind quantum computing and related protocols (2016, background): “On the other hand, the second category maintains a classical client, but allows that client to interact with multiple servers.(13) In all known protocols of this type, the privacy of the computation is only maintained provided that the servers do not communicate.”
Advances in quantum cryptography (2019, neutral): “Later proofs avoided such restrictions [75, 168–170], but still were not able to tolerate reasonable levels of either noise or had poor rates (or both).”
How "Quantum" is the D-Wave Machine? (2014, background): “While this is clearly a central issue in the context of quantum cryptography [1, 2] and certified random number generators [3, 4], it is also quite fundamental in the context of testing whether a claimed quantum computer is really quantum [5, 6, 7, 8].”
A device-independent quantum key distribution system for distant users (2021, methodology): “[18] Daniel Barredo, Sylvain De Léséleuc, Vincent Lienhard,”
Self-testing of quantum systems: a review (2019, methodology): “K11b] a self-testingstatementisimplicitlypresent,where theauthorsprovethatonlyanorthogonalsumof GHZstatescanmaximallyviolatetheMermininequality. In[CY14],thesequentialself-testingof nEPR-pairsprovenin[RUV13]isusedasasubprotocol for inﬁnite randomness expansion with aconstantnumberofdevices. Simplesy”