A New Paradigm for Understanding Women's Sexuality and Sexual Orientation

By L. A. Peplau, Linda D. Garnets. 2000

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b93cb5fca3721bac1c5b9b6edc975b98318c7aa0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Sabra L. Katz-Wise
2. Elizabeth M. Morgan
3. L. Mayers
4. Phillip L. Hammack
5. Eric P. Windell

In Gender Studies

1. Sabra L. Katz-Wise
2. Elizabeth M. Morgan
3. Phillip L. Hammack
4. B. Cohler

In Social Psychology

1. L. Mayers
2. Eric P. Windell
3. Elizabeth M. Morgan
4. Sabra L. Katz-Wise
5. Phillip L. Hammack
6. Jacquelyn W. White
7. B. Cohler
8. A. Pilecki

Citations in the corpus

• Sexual fluidity in young adult women and men: associations with sexual orientation and sexual identity development (2015, background): “The assumption of greater sexual fluidity in women compared to men (e.g., Baumeister, 2000; Diamond, 2008a; Peplau & Garnets, 2000) has been explained in a number of ways.”
• Narrative, psychology and the politics of sexual identity in the United States: from ‘sickness’ to ‘species’ to ‘subject’ (2013, background): “Peplau and colleagues called for a new paradigm within psychology to speak better to the experience of same-sexattracted women (e.g. Peplau, 2001; Peplau & Garnets, 2000; Peplau, Spalding, Conley, & Veniegas, 1999).”
• An Integrative Paradigm (2005, background): “…changes over the life course of an individual [Diamond, 2000, 2003a; Parks, 1999; Stein, 1997], which may be related to greater ‘erotic plasticity’ [Baumeister, 2000], sexual fluidity, and/or a more relational, sex-unspecific pattern of erotic preference [Peplau, 2001; Peplau & Garnets, 2000].”
• Contemporary Issues in Sexual Orientation and Identity Development in Emerging Adulthood (2013, background): “Scholars have suggested that sexual fluidity may be especially pronounced among women because of women’s partner-centered orientation whereby their identities are constructed and maintained within the context of relationships (Peplau & Garnets, 2000).”
• What We Got Wrong About Sexual Identity Development: Unexpected Findings From a Longitudinal Study of Young Women. (2006, unknown): “…although powerful critiques of rigid sexual classifications regularly appear in the social scientific literature (most recently in Blackwood, 2000; Peplau & Garnets, 2000; Rothblum, 2000; Rust, 2000), it is still the case that the first piece of information reported in most empirical studies of…”