The Lost Decades: Explaining Developing Countries' Stagnation in Spite of Policy Reform 1980-1998
By William R. Easterly. 2006
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b92ff38b106fe1eca6d051c0350aaedc2d107f6f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- C. Calderón
- David Wheeler
- L. Serven
- Enrique Moral-Benito
- Susmita Dasgupta
- Somik V. Lall
- Mark F. J. Steel
- David I. Stern
Citations in the corpus
- Shifting patterns of economic growth and rethinking development (2012, unknown): “The results of the policies presented as alternatives to the failed old structuralism were at best controversial (see Easterly 2001, 2005; Stiglitz and Ellerman, 2001 and World Bank 2005).”
- Infrastructure, growth, and inequality : an overview (2014, background): “In many cases, they use the number of telephone lines to proxy for infrastructure (e.g. Easterly 2001).”
- Policy Reform, Economic Growth and the Digital Divide (2005, methodology): “Although recent studies of economic growth assign increased importance to exogenous shocks (Easterly et al., 1993; Easterly, 2000), they continue to find that countries with liberal economic policies enjoy a significant growth advantage.”
- Is Infrastructure Capital Productive? A Dynamic Heterogeneous Approach (2011, background): “12 In the empirical growth literature, for example, the number of telephone lines per capita is usually taken as the preferred indicator of overall infrastructure availability; see for example Easterly (2001) and Loayza, Fajnzylber and Calderón (2005).”
- Infrastructure and growth in Africa (2009, background): “For instance, Easterly (2001) and Loayza, Fajnzylber, and Calderón (2005) use the measure of telephone penetration (main telephone lines per 1,000 people) as a proxy for infrastructure.”
- Was Development Assistance a Mistake (2012, unknown): “…by specifically testing the outcomes of the key Washington Consensus variables on growth, the results tended to confirm the casual empiricism described above – countries as a group moved towards " better policies, " yet average growth for that group declined for unknown reasons (Easterly 2001).”