Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effective and geographically balanced? An output-based assessment of non-state climate actions (2018, background): “The effectiveness of environmental regimes, for instance, can be measured by compliance, environmental and behavioural changes, or hypothetical counterfactuals (Andresen, 2013; Helm & Sprinz, 2000; Miles et al., 2002; Mitchell, 2008).”
Sustainable development policy: goals, targets and political cycles (2011, background): “Scholars have been under a lively debate to discuss the issue (see, for instance, Mitchell, 2006; Underdal and Young, 2004; Mitchell, 2003; Miles et al., 2001; Helm and Sprinz, 2000; Young, 1999).”
National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy? (2009, background): “…NGO activity+78 Moreover, democracies tend to have higher 73+ See, for example, von Stein 2008b+ 74+ Ibid, quotation from abstract+ 75+ See, for example, Helm and Sprinz 2000; Siegfried and Bernauer 2007+ 76+ See von Stein 2005+ 77+ See, for example, von Stein 2008a+ 78+ The lack of…”
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS: A Survey of Their Features, Formation, and Effects (2003, unknown): “Equally important, analysts may want to evaluate progress toward goals that differ from, or are more ambitious than, those held by the parties (81, 104).”