Generalized blockmodeling
By Patrick Doreian, V. Batagelj, A. Ferligoj. Structural analysis in the social sciences, 2005
345 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8f8ec72aa223ab51e303e3791d20be074221754
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Santo Fortunato
- Peter J. Mucha
- M. A. Porter
- Jean-Daniel Fekete
- Linyuan Lu
- Thomas Zaslavsky
- Nathalie Henry Riche
- Mark S. Handcock
Citations in the corpus
- Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths (2010, background): “One of these avenues of research has focused on the issue of tie strength, and a number of studies from a wide range of fields have begun to explore this issue (Barrat et al., 2004; Brandes, 2001; Doreian et al., 2005; Freeman et al., 1991; Granovetter, 1973; Newman, 2001; Opsahl and Panzarasa, 2009”
- Social network analysis: A methodological introduction (2008, background): “Some more recent innovations can be found in Carrington, Scott, and Wasserman (2005) and Doreian, Batagelj , and Ferlioj (2005), while Scott (1991) and Degenne and Forsé (1999) serve as accessible introductions to the field.”
- Model‐based clustering for social networks (2007, methodology): “Generalized blockmodelling (Doreian et al., 2005) permits ideal block types defining network equivalence to differ across pairs of blocks.”
- Link Prediction in Complex Networks: A Survey (2010, background): “Stochastic block model [84,85,86,87] is one of the most general network models, where nodes are partitioned into groups and the probability that two nodes are connected depends solely on the groups to which they belong.”
- Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels (2007, neutral): “In statistics, this line of research has been extended in various contexts over the years (Fienberg et al., 1985; Wasserman and Pattison, 1996; Snijders, 2002; Hoff et al., 2002; Doreian et al., 2004).”
- Link Prediction via Matrix Factorization (2011, background): “[4] assumes that nodes interact solely through their class memberships.”
- Community detection in graphs (2009, methodology): “…inference (Winkler, 2003), in which the best fit is obtained through the maximization of a likelihood (generative models), but we also discuss related techniques, based on blockmodeling (Doreian et al., 2005), model selection (Burnham and Anderson, 2002) and information theory (Mackay, 2003).”
- Core-Periphery Structure in Networks (2012, background): “, 15, 16, 19, 21, and 23) in the Zachary Karate Club network are automorphs of each other (such nodes are role equivalent [18, 20]), as one can swap their labels without changing the network structure.”
- network: A Package for Managing Relational Data in R (2008, neutral): “See also Doreian, et al. (2005).)”
- Multilayer networks (2013, methodology): “The earliest attempts to find structures similar to communities — as well as more general types of mesoscale features — in a multilayer network comes from the social-networks literature, where blockmodels were used to find sets of nodes that all share similar connection patterns [33, 112, 152, 350].”
- Opinion Dynamics and the Evolution of Social Power in Influence Networks (2015, background): “Classic problems of interest include comparative static analyses of social network structures [75, 24], functional implications of network structures [60], and numerical taxonomies of nodes [69, 10].”
- Interbank Tiering and Money Center Banks (2010, neutral): “Doing so for the German system would help distinguish regional intermediaries from the (few) genuine core banks intermediating across the entire country.21 20A row-functional block (Doreian et al. (2005)) in our context implies that every bank in the periphery relates to a single bank in the core.”
- MatrixExplorer: a Dual-Representation System to Explore Social Networks (2006, methodology): “Blockmodeling [13] intends to achieve this objective by decomposing the matrix in blocks of different shapes, using either clustering methods or equivalence relations defined on the graph.”
- A Mathematical Bibliography of Signed and Gain Graphs and Allied Areas (2018, methodology): “A later analysis via triples is in Doreian and Krackhardt (2001a).] (SD: Bal, Clu)”