The biogeography of naturalization in alien plants

By Petr Pyšek, D. Richardson. 2006

290 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8f2f4c5cf69be01939cbf076938aaa9c5ea5b77

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. P. Hulme
4. V. Jarošı́k
5. M. Vilà
6. Jan Pergl
7. John R. U. Wilson
8. I. Kühn

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. Wilfried Thuiller
4. M. Vilà
5. P. Hulme
6. Jan Pergl
7. V. Jarošı́k
8. John R. U. Wilson

In Plant Science

1. Petr Pyšek
2. D. Richardson
3. P. Hulme
4. I. Kühn
5. Jan Pergl
6. V. Jarošı́k
7. M. Vilà
8. John R. U. Wilson

Citations in the corpus

• The introduced flora of Madagascar (2012, background): “In hosting relatively few naturalized species in proportion to its native flora, the island shows characteristics more typically associated with continental landmasses than with islands (Pyšek and Richardson 2006).”
• Contrasting patterns in the invasions of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and vertebrates (2010, background): “…niche breath with latitude and corresponds to a similar pattern of decreasing invasion success with latitude previously reported for plants, although obtained by using a different measure (the percentage of naturalized species from the total number of introduced aliens; Pyšek & Richardson, 2006).”
• Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems (2011, background): “The tens rule is, to some extent, an artefact of the introduction history and residence time (Pyšek & Richardson, 2006), but even if all species in a lag phase were included, the majority of alien species will still be noninvasive (Ricciardi & Kipp, 2008).”
• Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe (2010, unknown): “This raises questions regarding the validity of studies that, in the absence of economic data, concluded that geographic factors are the main determinants of variation in the numbers of alien species at regional and continental scale (9, 10, 49).”
• Fish Invasions in the World's River Systems: When Natural Processes Are Blurred by Human Activities (2008, methodology): “Patterns of nonnative species richness are therefore relevant in forecasting the overall impact of invasions on a global scale [5] and should help management authorities to adopt sound, effective conservation policies [5–7].”
• Invasive alien plants in China: diversity and ecological insights (2008, background): “…has proved to be a useful approach to understanding alien species richness in various regions (Rozefelds et al. 1999; Stadler et al. 2000; Pyšek et al. 2004; Pyšek and Richardson 2006), and such datasets represent the necessary baseline information upon which management strategies can be built.”
• Alien plant invasions in tropical and sub-tropical savannas: patterns, processes and prospects (2010, background): “These include a range of terms which denote the status of introduced species at stages along the ‘‘naturalization-invasion continuum’’ (Pyšek and Richardson 2006), according to which species may be termed casual, naturalized, or invasive by invoking biogeographical criteria.”
• Elton, C.S. 1958: The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London: Methuen (2007, background): “Elton’s generalization that islands are more invaded than mainland areas has held up to scrutiny (see Pyšek and Richardson, 2006, for a status report for research on plant invasions).”
• Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework (2009, background): “The ideas of global competition have been used to explain the high degree of invasion on oceanic islands by dominant species from the mainland (Pysek & Richardson, 2006).”
• Invasive Exotic Plants in the Tropical Pacific Islands: Patterns of Diversity (2009, unknown): “THE APPARENT VULNERABILITY OF OCEANIC ISLANDS TO NATURALIZATION OF EXOTIC SPECIES IS well known (e.g., D’Antonio & Dudley 1995, Vitousek et al. 1997, Sax et al. 2002, Kueffer et al. 2004, Pyšek & Richardson 2006).”
• Residence time and potential range: crucial considerations in modelling plant invasions (2007, background): “Dispersal ability, ecological suitability of habitat, and biotic and abiotic barriers all interact to constrain naturalization in and spread across different spatial scales (Hobbs & Humphries, 1995; Rejmánek et al., 2005; Pysek & Richardson, 2006).”
• Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities. (2009, background): “Thus, a crucial distinguishing factor between native and alien species for the actual definition [ 67 ] and also for international agreements [68] becomes increasingly blurred with continued climate change.”
• Invasions: the trail behind, the path ahead, and a test of a disturbing idea (2012, unknown): “The rate of invasion tends to be higher on islands (Lonsdale 1999; Pysěk & Richardson 2006), although the impacts of invasions are not significantly different between islands and mainland sites ( Vilà et al. 2011).”