Social and Cognitive Factors Affecting the Own-Race Bias in Whites

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic review (2013, methodology): “…where recognition data was not collapsed over face types or encoding/recognition manipulations, data was included for own-race faces (Carroo, 1987; Slone et al., 2000), faces with normal attractiveness (Carroo & Mozingo, 1987), untransformed faces (McKelvie, 1987a), faces without spectacles…”
Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review (2001, background): “Although we have previously discussed the potential importance of response criterion measures in the ORB based on findings in our lab (Slone et al., 2000), few studies currently in the literature have documented this effect.”
Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach (2005, background): “In his IOM account of the CRE, Sporer (2001) attempted to bring together these varied social-cognitive explanations.”
The Influence of Race on Eyewitness Memory (2007, methodology): “The model also proposes to account for other in-group/out-group phenomena in the facial memory literature, such as the effects of age (Wright & Stroud, 2002) and gender (Slone et al., 2000).”
Inter-racial Contact and the Own-race Bias for Face Recognition in South Africa and England (2003, background): “Some studies have supported this hypothesis while others have not (see Slone et al., 2000 ).”