Oligotyping: Differentiating between closely related microbial taxa using 16S rRNA gene data

By A. Eren, L. Maignien, W. Sul, L. Murphy, Sharon L. Grim, Hilary G. Morrison, Mitchell L Sogin. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2013

612 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Bacteria comprise the most diverse domain of life on Earth, where they occupy nearly every possible ecological niche and play key roles in biological and chemical processes. Studying the composition and ecology of bacterial ecosystems and understanding their function are of prime importance. High‐throughput sequencing technologies enable nearly comprehensive descriptions of bacterial diversity through 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicons. Analyses of these communities generally rely upon taxonomic assignments through reference data bases or clustering approaches using de facto sequence similarity thresholds to identify operational taxonomic units. However, these methods often fail to resolve ecologically meaningful differences between closely related organisms in complex microbial data sets. In this paper, we describe oligotyping, a novel supervised computational method that allows researchers to investigate the diversity of closely related but distinct bacterial organisms in final operational taxonomic units identified in environmental data sets through 16S ribosomal RNA gene data by the canonical approaches. Our analysis of two data sets from two different environments demonstrates the capacity of oligotyping at discriminating distinct microbial populations of ecological importance. Oligotyping can resolve the distribution of closely related organisms across environments and unveil previously overlooked ecological patterns for microbial communities. The URL http://oligotyping.org offers an open‐source software pipeline for oligotyping.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8b3cd213112bc2b5108947a895520187703332f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Rob Knight
  2. Susan M. Huse
  3. J. Gregory Caporaso
  4. Mitchell L Sogin
  5. William Walters
  6. Hilary G. Morrison
  7. A. M. Eren
  8. Susan P. Holmes

In Molecular Biology

  1. Rob Knight
  2. J. Gregory Caporaso
  3. Susan P. Holmes
  4. Paul J. McMurdie
  5. Susan M. Huse
  6. William Walters
  7. Mitchell L Sogin
  8. L. Ursell

Citations in the corpus