Short-term temporal stability and factor structure of the revised experiences in close relationships (ECR-R) measure of adult attachment
By Chris G. Sibley, James H. Liu. 2004
333 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Demography, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8b3a72fa1c6886aca39566e1cdbe170f717a08a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- K. Brenning
- G. Bosmans
- J. Carroll
- James L. Zapf
- Aldert Vrij
- R. Wilkinson
- J. Greiner
- Judith A. Feeney
In Demography
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- An adaptation of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale-Revised for use with children and adolescents (2011, background): “The factors explained approximately half of the variance in attachment, which is similar to the percentage of explained variance in previous research with the ECR-R (e.g., Sibley & Liu, 2004).”
- Individual differences and lying in everyday life (2008, result): “Similar to other investigations (e.g., Sibley & Liu, 2004), the two scales were moderately correlated (r = .42, p < .01) and internally consistent ( = .93 and = .94).”
- Attachment Styles and Male Sex Addiction (2008, background): “Sibley and Liu (2004) found the internal reliabilities for the two subscales, anxiety and avoidance, are high (.9477 and .9344; respectively).”
- Exhausted Parents: Sociodemographic, Child-Related, Parent-Related, Parenting and Family-Functioning Correlates of Parental Burnout (2018, neutral): “The ECR-R has high construct and predictive validity (Sibley, Fischer, & Liu, 2005; Sibley & Liu, 2004).”
- Adult attachment measures: a 25-year review. (2010, background): “[59] 36 S VS Partner (or general) D Attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance ++ +++ [5,8,9,14,24, 60,76–79,130, 143,144] Fraley and Shaver [27] 36”
- Is less more? Confirmatory factor analysis of the Attachment Style Questionnaires (2010, background): “While categorical measures show, on average, 30% change in romantic attachment style over a short time period (e.g., Baldwin & Fehr, 1995; Kirkpatrick & Hazan, 1994), studies using dimensional assessments report up to 87% stability in adult attachment style (Sibley & Liu, 2004).”