Assessing genetic risk in revegetation

By M. Byrne, L. Stone, M. Millar. 2011

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assisted Gene Flow to Facilitate Local Adaptation to Climate Change (2013, background): “F or p er so na l u se o nl y. ES44CH18-Aitken ARI 21 October 2013 21:12 Evolutionary rescue: reversal of the demographic decline of a population through adaptation to new environmental conditions (Tallmon et al. 2004, Byrne et al. 2011, Miller et al. 2012).”
Bridging the gap: a genetic assessment framework for population‐level threatened plant conservation prioritization and decision‐making (2016, background): “…(Whiteley et al., 2014), but in the absence of such studies, it may be appropriate to proceed with caution and take a risk management approach (Byrne et al., 2011; Frankham et al., 2011; Weeks et al., 2011), for example, by establishing new mixed-source populations in isolation from…”
Climate-adjusted provenancing: a strategy for climate-resilient ecological restoration (2015, background): “This strategy should be implemented within a genetic risk framework, that assesses potential benefits against risks of outbreeding depression to surrounding plant communities (Byrne et al., 2011; Weeks et al., 2011) and risks to dependent biota (Whitham et al., 2006).”
A framework for incorporating evolutionary genomics into biodiversity conservation and management (2015, background): “soil symbionts, disease, weed risk), and there are decision frameworks available for managing these issues [199,208,209] that can be applied in a wider climatic context.”