The CMU Pose, Illumination, and Expression (PIE) database
By Terence Sim, Simon Baker, Maan Bsat. 2002
1,798 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Evaluation & Benchmarks
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Xiaogang Wang
- Trevor Darrell
- Andrew Zisserman
- Jitendra Malik
- Yi Yang
In Evaluation & Benchmarks
Citations in the corpus
- FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering (2015, background): “Shown are image pairs from PIE [13] that previously were considered to be very difficult for face verification systems.”
- Joint Unsupervised Learning of Deep Representations and Image Clusters (2016, positive): “Interestingly, we achieved perfect results (NMI = 1) on COIL20 and CMU-PIE datasets, which means that all samples in the same category are clustered into the same group.”
- Matrix Coherence and the Nystrom Method (2010, background): “Equations (12) and (14) further reduce Dataset Type of data # Points ( n ) # Features ( d ) Kernel PIE (Sim et al. , 2002) face images 2731 2304 linear MNIST (LeCun and Cortes, 1998) digit images 4000 784 linear Essential (Gustafson et al. , 2006) proteins 4728 16 RBF Abalone (Asuncion and Newman,…”
- Face recognition using Histograms of Oriented Gradients (2011, methodology): “The experimental results were evaluated using four face databases: FERET (Phillips et al., 2000), AR (Martinez and Benavente, 1998), CMU Multi-PIE (Sim et al., 2001) and Yale ( Yale face database , 2009).”
- FaceTracer: A Search Engine for Large Collections of Images with Faces (2008, background): “In contrast, existing face datasets such as Yale Face A&B [16], CMU PIE [17], and FERET [6] are either much smaller in size and/or taken in highly controlled settings.”
- Deep Clustering via Joint Convolutional Autoencoder Embedding and Relative Entropy Minimization (2017, neutral): “CMU-PIE: A dataset including 32 by 32 face images of 68 people with 4 different expressions [40].”
- Acquiring linear subspaces for face recognition under variable lighting (2005, background): “A more recent database designed for similar purposes is the PIE database from CMU (see [18]).”
- A Comprehensive Survey to Face Hallucination (2013, methodology): “2000), PIE (Sim et al. 2002) BI(GP) VP N/A”
- Sampling Methods for the Nyström Method (2012, neutral): “Table 1: Description of the datasets and kernels used in fixed and adaptive sampling experiments (Sim et al., 2002; LeCun and Cortes, 1998; Gustafson et al., 2006; Asuncion and Newman, 2007 ).”
- Maximum Margin Correlation Filter: A New Approach for Localization and Classification (2013, neutral): “of the CMU PIE database [39] with images that have been captured over multiple sessions (maximum of 5 sessions).”
- Utility data annotation with Amazon Mechanical Turk (2008, background): “It is obvious from this figure that hips are much more difficult to localize compared to shoulders, knees, elbows, wrists, ankles, the head and the neck.”
- Studying Very Low Resolution Recognition Using Deep Networks (2016, background): “Dataset Although many face image datasets, such as LFW [13], SCface [11], and CMU-PIE [27], have been developed, most of them were collected in controlled indoor environments with limited variability.”