Refractive error in children in an urban population in New Delhi.

By G. Murthy, Sanjeev K. Gupta, L. Ellwein, S. Muñoz, G. Pokharel, L. Sanga, D. Bachani. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2002

660 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia (2011, unknown): “7% in 7, 10 and 15-year-olds, respectively in the rural region.(31,32) Among urban Chinese children the prevalence of myopia ranged from 5.”
Refractive error in children in a rural population in India. (2002, background): “A companion article in this issue reports RESC data from an urban population residing in metropolitan New Delhi.(9) A significant difference between this survey, the earlier ones, and the companion study in New Delhi is that the sample was drawn from children between 7 and 15 years of age, rather th”
The epidemics of myopia: Aetiology and prevention (2017, unknown): “…of development of t Data taken from: Czepita et al., 2007; Dandona et al., 2002b; Ding et al., 2017; French et al., 2013a; Guo et al., McCullough et al., 2016; Murthy et al., 2002; Naidoo et al., 2003; Pokharel et al., 2000; Shih e the Guangzhou Twin Eye Study. be confounded by parallel changes.”
How genetic is school myopia? (2005, methodology): “Cut-off Method Reference Japan Obushi and Higashiura-cho, males 1997–2000 40–49 70 p 0.5D Non-cycloplegic autorefraction Shimizu et al. (2003) Japan Obushi and Higashiura-cho, females 1997–2000 40–49 60 p 0.5D Non-cycloplegic autorefraction Shimizu et al. (2003) Mongolia Hovsgol and Omnogobi, males ”