What do artificial nests tells us about nest predation
By L. Zanette. 2002
151 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b889d2ad525f2ad1c3293f957d433b2daa645a3e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Frank R. Thompson
- A. Chalfoun
- Katherine K. Thorington
- R. Bowman
- D. Burhans
- J. D. Ibáñez-Álamo
- R. Magrath
- T. Haff
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- J. D. Ibáñez-Álamo
- D. Burhans
- R. Bowman
- R. Magrath
- A. Chalfoun
- T. Haff
- Katherine K. Thorington
- Frank R. Thompson
Citations in the corpus
- Differences in Predators of Artificial and Real Songbird Nests: Evidence of Bias in Artificial Nest Studies (2004, background): “…comparing artificial and real nests have inferred that potential biases exist with artificial nests (Wilson et al. 1998; Davison & Bollinger 2000; Zanette 2002; Burke et al. 2004), but because they did not directly identify predators at both nest types, they could only speculate about processes…”
- Nest predation research: recent findings and future perspectives (2015, background): “2014) even though artificial nests often produce unrealistic patterns of nest predation (e.g. Weidinger 2001; Zanette 2002; Moore and Robinson 2004).”
- Predation rate on artificial nests increases with human housing density in suburban habitats (2003, methodology): “The value in this method lies in making relative comparisons among treatments rather than absolute estimates of rates of nest predation (Part and Wretenberg 2001, Zanette 2002).”