Use of fish production per unit biomass ratios for measuring the productive capacity of fish habitats
By R. G. Randall, C. K. Minns. 2000
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8691c8691d13e8681faf63242b74adc5137cecf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aquatic Science
In Global and Planetary Change
- J. Rosenfeld
- T. Hatfield
- M. Lowry
- C. Champion
- James A. Smith
- I. Suthers
- Michel Loreau
- Andrew Gonzalez
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- T. Hatfield
- J. Rosenfeld
- M. Lowry
- C. Champion
- James A. Smith
- I. Suthers
- Michel Loreau
- Andrew Gonzalez
Citations in the corpus
- Competition for the fish – fish extraction from the Baltic Sea by humans, aquatic mammals, and birds (2018, unknown): “For lakes, it has been suggested that fishing is generally sustainable at catch rates corresponding to<15% of the biomass (Downing and Plante, 1993), and as production is usually around 50% of the biomass (Downing and Plante, 1993; Randall and Minns, 2000), this corresponds to an extraction level of”
- A designed artificial reef is among the most productive marine fish habitats: new metrics to address ‘production versus attraction’ (2016, background): “the production/biomass ratio, P/B) is equal to the instantaneous total mortality of an organism (Dickie 1972; Mertz and Myers 1998; Randall and Minns 2000).”
- Information needs for assessing critical habitat of freshwater fish (2006, background): “Production is the emergent population-level measure of habitat quality that integrates the effects of individual growth and survival (Randall and Minns 2000).”