Faculty Research Productivity in Hong Kong across Academic Discipline
By Jisun Jung. 2012
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This study examines the research productivity of Hong Kong academics. Specifically, it explores the individual and institutional factors that contribute to their productivity while also comparing determinants across academic disciplines. We have conducted OLS regression analysis using the international survey data from “The Changing Academics Profession.” We found that Hong Kong academics are highly internationalized in terms of research activities. Moreover, research productivity is influenced by a number of factors, including personal characteristics, workload, differences in research styles, and institutional characteristics. In addition, considerable variation exists regarding the determinants of research productivity across disciplinary categories.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b860ca568ab7dc3b2ed2591c696a53a06664f13d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- The Impact of Publishing During PhD Studies on Career Research Publication, Visibility, and Collaborations (2016, background): “The inclusion of this variable was due to the extensive literature that reports productivity and citation patterns that largely differ between different scientific fields, with the so-called ‘‘hard’’ sciences having more overall citation intensity than the ‘‘soft’’ sciences (Jung 2012; Shin and Cumm”
- Knowledge Production and Contradictory Functions in African Higher Education (2015, background): “This is based on the starting point that disciplinary differences have an important impact on research productivity (Becher 1989; Jung 2012).”