Distribution of three monkey species along a gradient of regenerating tropical dry forest

By T. Sorensen, L. Fedigan. 2000

84 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Focusing Conservation Efforts for the Critically Endangered Brown-headed Spider Monkey (Ateles fusciceps) Using Remote Sensing, Modeling, and Playback Survey Methods (2011, background): “…a risk of overestimating forested area suitable for the primate because farming practices that generate a canopy-like structure, such as palm oil plantations and areas of secondary regrowth unsuitable for Ateles fusciceps (Sorensen and Fedigan 2000), could be classified as forest in this analysis.”
Neotropical Primates in a Regenerating Costa Rican Dry Forest: A Comparison of Howler and Capuchin Population Patterns (2001, background): “In a study comparing the age of forest patches and densities of monkeys within Santa Rosa, Sorensen and Fedigan (2000), documented that more monkeys live in the older forest patches.”
Assessment of large-vertebrate species richness and relative abundance in Neotropical forest using line-transect censuses: what is the minimal effort required? (2008, background): “…with cumulated survey length ranging from 40 to 600 km (Bodmer et al 1997; Carillo et al. 2000; de Thoisy et al. 2000; Lopes and Ferrari 2000; Peres 2000; Sorensen and Fedigan 2000; Wright et al. 2000; Cullen et al. 2001; de Thoisy et al. 2005; Haugaasen and Peres 2005a; Haugaasen and Peres 2005b).”