A general lower bound on the number of examples needed for learning
By Andrzej Ehrenfeucht, David Haussler, Michael Kearns, Leslie G. Valiant. 1988
Subfields: Scaling & Learning Theory
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Scaling & Learning Theory
- Nati Srebro
- Philip M. Long
- Alex Smola
- Michael Kearns
- Andrew Y. Ng
- Gábor Lugosi
- Peter L. Bartlett
- Olivier Bousquet
Citations in the corpus
- An Analysis of the Adaptation Speed of Causal Models (2020, background): “smaller VC-dimension (Vapnik & Chervonenkis, 1971), turns into a smaller generalization gap (Ehrenfeucht et al., 1989).”
- A Meta-Transfer Objective for Learning to Disentangle Causal Mechanisms (2019, background): “Since sample complexity - the number of training examples necessary to learn a model - grows approximately linearly (Ehrenfeucht et al., 1989) with VC-dimension (Vapnik and Chervonenkis, 1971), and since VC-dimension grows approximately linearly in the number of parameters in linear models and…”
- Learning Optimized Or's of And's (2015, background): “The closest work to ours are that of Hauser et al. (2010) in the marketing literature, and Wang et al. (2015) on Bayesian modeling of DNF formulae.”
- Characterizing the sample complexity of private learners (2013, background): “It is well known that the sample complexity of learning a concept class C (non-privately) is proportional to a complexity measure of the class C knowns as the VC-dimension [20, 6, 13].”
- Active and passive learning of linear separators under log-concave distributions (2012, background): “(Ehrenfeucht et al., 1989) proved a bound that implies anΩ(d/ǫ+(1/ǫ) log(1/δ)) lower bound for linear separators and explicitly posed the question of providing tight bounds for this class.”
- Feature selection, L1 vs. L2 regularization, and rotational invariance (2004, methodology): “The proof of this result is given in Appendix B, and uses ideas from the lower-bounds originally proved by (Ehrenfeucht et al., 1989; Vapnik, 1982).”
- Bandwidth choice for nonparametric classification (2005, background): “The setting where Bayes risk equals zero is sometimes addressed in the context of machine learning [see, e.g., Ehrenfeucht, Haussler, Kearns and Valiant (1989) ].”
- Introduction to Statistical Learning Theory (2004, methodology): “The use of empirical processes in classification was pioneered by Vapnik and Chervonenkis [18, 15] and re-discovered 20 years later by Blumer, Ehrenfeucht, Haussler, and Warmuth [32], Ehrenfeucht, Haussler, Kearns, and Valiant [33].”
- Cost-sensitive learning by cost-proportionate example weighting (2003, unknown): “A fundamental theorem from PAC-learning theory states that m 1 ε 1 δ Ω 1 ε ln 1 δ [4].”
- Precision-Recall versus Accuracy and the Role of Large Data Sets (2019, background): “The asymptotic sample complexity of obtaining a given accuracy is now known exactly: A matching lower bound was proved in two parts; first, a Ω( 1 log 1 δ ) lower bound was obtained by Blumer et al. (1989), and subsequently an Ω( d/(cid:15) ) bound was proved by Ehrenfeucht et al. (1989).”