THE GOLD STANDARD: THE CHALLENGE OF EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE AND STANDARDIZATION IN HEALTH CARE

By A. Rosoff. 2004

954 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

‘A mechanistic interpretation, if possible’: How does predictive modelling causality affect the regulation of chemicals? (2016, background): “…and hoped to be used as relevant regulatory tools would be different from the institutions in which positivist evidence-based processes form the basis for policy interventions – and in which the very notion of ‘evidence’ itself is insufficiently problematised (see, e.g., Timmermans and Berg, 2003).”
A Review of 25 Years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas (2013, background): “Timmermans and Berg (2003) distinguish between four broad categories of standards: design standards, performance standards, terminological standards, and procedural standards.”
Rehabilitation: Beyond Nothing Works (2013, background): “Over the past two decades, there has been a growing movement to use evidence as the basis of decision making in many fields, including medicine, education, and baseball (Lewis 2003; Timmermans and Berg 2003; Ayres 2007; Cullen, Myer, and Latessa 2009).”