The variational Bayesian EM algorithm for incomplete data: with application to scoring graphical model structures
By Matthew J. Beal, Zoubin Ghahramani. 2003
572 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sergey Levine
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Dacheng Tao
- Trevor Darrell
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Quoc V. Le
Citations in the corpus
- Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians (2016, neutral): “This has been explored for mixture models (Ueda and Ghahramani 2002; McGrory and Titterington 2007) and more generally (Beal and Ghahramani 2003).”
- Concrete Dropout (2017, methodology): “The output precision parameter τ was determined using a variational (MAP-)EM algorithm [3]: the variational parameters (variational E–step), and τ (M–step) are optimised iteratively by gradient ascent on (ELBO + log p ( τ )) .”
- Fixed-Form Variational Posterior Approximation through Stochastic Linear Regression (2012, methodology): “…exponential form, choosing Q to be the set of factorized distributions q ( x ) = q ( x 1 ) q ( x 2 ) . . . q ( x k ) often leads to a tractable optimization problem that can be solved efficiently using an algorithm called Variational Bayes Expectation Maximization (VBEM, Beal and Ghahramani, 2002).”
- Structured Priors for Structure Learning (2006, methodology): “Such data could be incorporated via approximations to the marginal likelihood such as those from [Beal and Ghahramani, 2003].”
- MOrdReD: Memory-based Ordinal Regression Deep Neural Networks for Time Series Forecasting (2018, methodology): “We refer the reader to [42], [43], [44] and [45] for a more detailed discussion of Variational Bayes GMMs.”
- Hierarchical Models in the Brain (2008, methodology): “This is known as variational Bayes; see [16] for an excellent treatment of static conjugate-exponential models.”
- Mixed Membership Stochastic Blockmodels (2007, unknown): “The approximate variant of EM we describe here is often referred to as Variational EM (Beal and Ghahramani, 2003).”
- Improving Inference for Neural Image Compression (2020, methodology): “We emphasize a distinction between variational inference and variational expectation maximization (EM) [Beal and Ghahramani, 2003]: whereas variational EM trains a model, VI is used to compress data using a trained model.”
- Online Sparse Multi-Output Gaussian Process Regression and Learning (2019, methodology): “With particle resampling (line 8 in Algorithm 2), the ELBO is indeed used in a similar way as in [61] for selecting the particles, or equivalently speaking, choosing different sparse multi-output GP models.”
- Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning (2004, methodology): “This approach can, for example, be used to score graphical model structures [54].”
- A physics-aware, probabilistic machine learning framework for coarse-graining high-dimensional systems in the Small Data regime (2019, background): “if θk is effectively one of the component variables θ̃c,jm, τc,m, γjm, τcf,i,λ (n) c ), then the optimal Qθk(θk) can be found by setting the first order variation of F(Q) to zero yielding (Beal and Ghahramani, 2003)”
- Unsupervised Learning (2018, unknown): “This approach can, for example, be used to score graphical model structures [54].”
- DEM: A variational treatment of dynamic systems (2008, unknown): “This is known as variational Bayes; see Beal and Ghahramani (2003) for an excellent treatment of conjugate-exponential models.”
- An Empirical Bayesian Strategy for Solving the Simultaneous Sparse Approximation Problem (2007, methodology): “We do not address the alternative variational technique of forming a factorial approximation that minimizes a free-energy-based cost function [1], [2].”
- Variational EM Algorithms for Non-Gaussian Latent Variable Models (2005, methodology): “In the ensemble learning approach (also Variational Bayes [4, 3, 6]) the idea is to find the approximate separable posterior that minimizes the KL divergence from the true posterior, using the following decomposition of the log likelihood, log p ( y ) = q ( z | y ) log p ( z , y ) q ( z | y ) d z + D”