MITOCHONDRIAL DATING AND MIXED SUPPORT FOR THE “2% RULE” IN BIRDS
By I. Lovette. 2004
272 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Genetics, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7f0aae0abba4789a0be24c86dbeda926bcb2d01
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Animal Science and Zoology
In Genetics
In Small Animals
Citations in the corpus
- Is there a universal mtDNA clock for birds (2004, background): “known history seem to be a good source of opportunities and deserve further scrutiny (Lovette 2004), at least two of the current avian calibrations derive from such”
- Calibrating the avian molecular clock (2008, background): “obtained (e.g. summarized in Garcia-Moreno 2004; Lovette 2004) and are insufficient to test the general validity of the”
- Mitochondrial introgression and replacement between yellowhammers (Emberiza citrinella) and pine buntings (Emberiza leucocephalos) (Aves: Passeriformes) (2009, methodology): “DNA was extracted using a standard phenol–chloroform protocol.”
- Phylogeography: its development and impact in Australo-Papuan ornithology with special reference to paraphyly in Australian birds (2009, background): “Assuming a rate of divergence in mtDNA of 1.6–2.0% per million years (Fleischer et al.1998; also see Lovette 2004; Ho 2007; Weir and Schluter 2008), one infers that the hybridisation that caused this paraphyly likely occurred on the order of hundreds of thousands of years ago.”
- Are the Northern Andes a species pump for Neotropical birds? Phylogenetics and biogeography of a clade of Neotropical tanagers (Aves: Thraupini) (2010, unknown): “Moreover, the assumption that the mtDNA evolutionary rate for a particular group of birds is the same as the rate for a group with a good calibration is questionable (Graur & Martin, 2004; Lovette, 2004; Ho & Larson, 2006; Peterson, 2006).”