Competing models of firm profitability
By Margaret E. Slade. 2004
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad1873f5b78490765ac9a31b2b447934414f3aed
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- John O. S. Wilson
- John Goddard
- Manouche Tavakoli
- Yong Tan
- Hong Liu
- Fadzlan Sufian
- Phil Molyneux
- Antonio Trujillo-Ponce
Citations in the corpus
- Determinants of profitability in European manufacturing and services: evidence from a dynamic panel model (2005, background): “4 Slade ( 2004 ) reviews the relationship between market share and profitability from both a theoretical and an empirical perspective.”
- Inverted-U relationship between R&D intensity and survival : evidence on scale and complementarity effects in UK data. (2016, unknown): “This approximation is justified on the basis of theoretical and empirical findings that firm profit and market concentration are correlated positively in different industries (Bain, 1951; Peltzman, 1977; Tirole, 1988; Berger 1995; Slade 2004).”
- The long-term effect of digital innovation on bank performance: An empirical study of SWIFT adoption in financial services (2017, unknown): “Accounting profits can diverge from economic profits, but the two are likely to be correlated at the firm level and there is a tradition in industrial economics which supports using profitability as a key measure of firm performance (Slade, 2004).”