Enzyme function prediction using contrastive learning
By Tianhao Yu, Haiyang Cui, J. Li, Yunan Luo, Guangde Jiang, Huimin Zhao. Science, 2023
436 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Enzyme function annotation is a fundamental challenge, and numerous computational tools have been developed. However, most of these tools cannot accurately predict functional annotations, such as enzyme commission (EC) number, for less-studied proteins or those with previously uncharacterized functions or multiple activities. We present a machine learning algorithm named CLEAN (contrastive learning–enabled enzyme annotation) to assign EC numbers to enzymes with better accuracy, reliability, and sensitivity compared with the state-of-the-art tool BLASTp. The contrastive learning framework empowers CLEAN to confidently (i) annotate understudied enzymes, (ii) correct mislabeled enzymes, and (iii) identify promiscuous enzymes with two or more EC numbers—functions that we demonstrate by systematic in silico and in vitro experiments. We anticipate that this tool will be widely used for predicting the functions of uncharacterized enzymes, thereby advancing many fields, such as genomics, synthetic biology, and biocatalysis. Description A crystal ball for enzyme activities With rapidly growing genomic and metagenomic databases, we have vastly more sequence data than functional data for enzymes. Accurate functional annotation from sparse experimental evidence is therefore crucial for analysis and applications when working from sequence data. Hoping to circumvent the limitations of current approaches, Yu et al. developed a machine learning model based on contrastive learning that performs particularly well at discerning enzyme function. In addition to comparing the performance of the method with existing tools, the authors experimentally validated predicted functions of 36 enzymes that form carbon–halogen bonds. They found excellent prediction accuracy and the ability to distinguish between similar activities. —MAF A contrastive learning algorithm enables accurate enzyme function annotation.
Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7d8827822ba31344a528b9f6e9dd5b7d3a8a50f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
In Molecular Biology
- Michael Heinzinger
- Burkhard Rost
- Konstantin Weissenow
- Martin Steinegger
- Jin Su
- Chenchen Han
- Junjie Shan
- Yuyang Zhou
Citations in the corpus
- Bilingual language model for protein sequence and structure (2024, background): “…prediction, including, for function prediction: gene ontology [12], transport signals [13], binding residues [14], or subcellular location [15], [16], and for protein structure prediction: 2D [17] and 3D structure [6], fold classification [18], [19], or intrinsically disordered regions [20], [21].”
- SaProt: Protein Language Modeling with Structure-aware Vocabulary (2024, background): “…applications, including clinical disease variant prediction (Frazer et al., 2021), fitness landscape prediction (Dallago et al., 2021; He et al., 2024), protein-protein interaction (Nooren & Thornton, 2003), as well as diverse protein function predictions (Bileschi et al., 2022; Yu et al., 2023).”