Gamma correction for digital fringe projection profilometry.

By Hongwei Guo, Haitao He, Mingyi Chen. Applied Optics, 2004

314 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Fringe projection techniques: Whither we are? (2010, methodology): “caused by the equipment used and proposing possible corrections [63, 64, 65, 66], developing new fringe analysis methods to extract underlying phase distribution [67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83], improving existing fringe analysis methods [84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, ”
Comparison of Fourier transform, windowed Fourier transform, and wavelet transform methods for phase extraction from a single fringe pattern in fringe projection profilometry (2010, background): “Non-sinusoidal waveform may be due to the gamma parameter [21] of the digital projector or the nonlinear response function of the whole system [22,23].”