Variation in the phase structure of applicatives

By M. McGinnis. 2001

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A–movement and the EPP (2002, background): “Sigurðsson (personal communication), Icelandic, which like French hasthe experiencer blocking effect (see Boeckx 2000c; McGinnis 1998, 2001; Holmberg & Hróarsdóttir 2002; Stepanov 2002; and Thráinsson 1979, among others), patternswith French in that the blocking effect disappearsin expletive…”
Delayed Valuation: A Reanalysis of Goal Features, “Upward” Complementizer Agreement, and the Mechanics of Case (2016, methodology): “In an “asymmetrical” language, Appl is not a phase head so DO cannot raise (cf. McGinnis 2001). vP 4 SU v’ 4 v ApplLP 4 IO ApplL’ 4 ApplL VP 4 : V DO z--------_---------m McGinnis’s successful analysis of the two varieties of applicatives extends nicely to the symmetrical DOCs of Lubukusu.”
Rescue by PF Deletion, Traces as (Non)interveners, and the That-Trace Effect (2011, background): “5 The grammaticality of such constructions in English presents a very interesting problem that will not be addressed here; see Boeckx 2000, 2009, Chomsky 1995, Kitahara 1997, McGinnis 1998, 2001, Stepanov 2002, Torrego 1996, and Ura 2000, among others, for relevant discussion.”