A NEW SPECIMEN OF NEUQUENSAURUS AUSTRALIS, A LATE CRETACEOUS SALTASAURINE TITANOSAUR FROM NORTH PATAGONIA
By L. Salgado, S. Apesteguía, S. Heredia. 2005
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b777703082be341bf6edffe0af62654bf6520324
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Paleontology
Citations in the corpus
- The Appendicular Skeleton of Neuquensaurus, a Late Cretaceous Saltasaurine Sauropod from Patagonia, Argentina (2010, methodology): “The area behind the crest has a proximo− distally elongate concavity that follows the length of the crest (see also Salgado et al. 2005).”
- The Osteology of Chubutisaurus insignis Del Corro, 1975 (Dinosauria: Neosauropoda) from the ‘Middle’ Cretaceous of Central Patagonia, Argentina (2011, background): “In Patagonia, most titanosauriform taxa come from the Upper Cretaceous of the Neuquén Basin (northwestern Patagonia), which represent derived titanosaurs from post-Cenomanian rocks (e.g., Neuquensaurus, Powell, 1992; Rocasaurus, Salgado and Azpilicueta, 2000; Mendozasaurus, González Riga, 2003; Fu”
- A Reappraisal of the Late Cretaceous Argentinean Sauropod Dinosaur Argyrosaurus superbus, with a Description of a New Titanosaur Genus (2012, background): “Elsewhere, this ACDL has been interpreted as a ventral bi-furcation of the posterior centrodiapophyseal lamina (PCDL) (Bonaparte, 1999a; Bonaparte et al., 2006) or as a separate accessory lamina (Salgado et al., 2005) (see discussion in Wilson and Upchurch, 2009; Mannion and Calvo, 2011).”
- The postcranial osteology of Rapetosaurus krausei (Sauropoda: Titanosauria) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar (2009, background): “…neural spine of Epachthosaurus (UNPSJBPV 920, Martı́nez et al., 2004), with the posterorly inclined, rectangular neural spine of Isisaurus (ISI R335, Jain and Bandyopadhyay, 1997), and with the posteriorly inclined, rounded neural spine of Neuquensaurus (MCS-5/1-8, Salgado et al., 2005).”
- A New Sauropod: Tastavinsaurus Sanzi Gen. Et Sp. Nov. from the Early Cretaceous (Aptian) of Spain (2008, unknown): “2) follows Wilson (1999) with modifications (apcdl) from Salgado et al. (2005).”
- A NEW TITANOSAUR SAUROPOD FROM THE LATE CRETACEOUS OF NEUQUÉN, PATAGONIA, ARGENTINA 1 (2007, background): “, 1999), Alamosaurus sanjuanensis (GILMORE, 1946), Neuquensaurus australis (HUENE, 1929; POWELL, 1986; SALGADO et al., 2005), Opisthocoelicaudia skarzynskii (BORSUKBIALYNICKA, 1977), Saltasaurus loricatus (BONAPARTE & POWELL, 1980; POWELL, 1992), Rocasaurus muniozi (SALGADO & AZPILICUETA, 2000), and”
- Revision of the sauropod dinosaur Diamantinasaurus matildae Hocknull et al. 2009 from the mid-Cretaceous of Australia: Implications for Gondwanan titanosauriform dispersal (2015, background): “Similarly, Neuquensaurus is known frommultiple individuals (von Huene, 1929), yet only three metacarpals have yet been identified (Otero, 2010); it is unfortunate that the specimen reported by Salgado et al. (2005) lacks any forelimb elements distal to the humerus.”
- Osteology and phylogenetic relationships of Tehuelchesaurus benitezii (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Upper Jurassic of Patagonia (2011, background): “It might be noted that a similar orientation of laminae is present in some other sauropods (e.g. of the PCPL and PCDL in Neuquensaurus; Salgado et al., 2005), but the (probably biomechanical) reasons for the orientation of vertebral laminae in sauropods require further analyses.”
- Anatomy of the basal titanosaur (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) Andesaurus delgadoi from the mid-Cretaceous (Albian–early Cenomanian) Río Limay Formation, Neuquén Province, Argentina: implications for titanosaur systematics (2011, background): “Until recently, our concept of titanosaur evolution has remained limited; however, this is changing through new discoveries (e.g. Curry Rogers & Forster, 2001; Day et al., 2002; Martínez et al., 2004; Salgado et al., 2005; Calvo et al., 2007, 2008a; You et al., 2008; Hocknull et al., 2009), taxonomi”