A critical review of the absorption cross-sections of O3 and NO2 in the ultraviolet and visible

By J. Orphal. 2003

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluation of the use of five laboratory-determined ozone absorption cross sections in Brewer and Dobson retrieval algorithms (2013, background): “%) as the cross section (Orphal, 2003; Serdyuchenko et al., 2013) but the choice of the temperatures at which the fit is performed can give different results (Scarnato et al., 2009; Fragkos et al., 2013b).”
Ozone profile and tropospheric ozone retrievals from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment: Algorithm description and validation (2005, methodology): “We use the ozone absorption cross sections by Brion et al. [1993] because they have more accurate wavelength calibration [Orphal, 2003] and the fitting residuals are reduced by 10–20% compared to using Bass-Paur (BP) cross sections [Bass and Paur, 1985] and GOME flight-model cross sections [Burrows…”
The GEISA spectroscopic database: Current and future archive for Earth and planetary atmosphere studies (2008, unknown): “4 nm above 400 nm; (2) absorption cross-sections measured with an FTS in the 230–830 nm range [58], again at five temperatures between 203 and 293K, with a spectral resolution that is significantly higher than the O3 absorption features [59] and with very accurate spectral calibration; (3) absorptio”