The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: Has It Outlived Its Usefulness?

By Roxanne L. Lalonde, E. L. Jackson. 2002

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b75533b159ed1351b7ab8dbad1717c6cbcc2666f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. G. Place
2. Jim Sibthorp
3. Alan Ewert
4. Jonathan W. Amburgey
5. Dustin B. Thoman
6. N. Erdoğan
7. Julie Ernst
8. C. J. Riper

In Marketing

1. Alan Ewert
2. G. Place
3. Jonathan W. Amburgey
4. Dustin B. Thoman
5. N. Erdoğan
6. Jim Sibthorp
7. C. J. Riper
8. G. Kyle

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Place
2. Jim Sibthorp
3. Alan Ewert
4. Jonathan W. Amburgey
5. Dustin B. Thoman
6. N. Erdoğan

Citations in the corpus

• Dimensionality of the New Ecological Paradigm (2012, methodology): “The NEP scale has received scrutiny on psychometric grounds (e.g., Lalonde & Jackson, 2002; Mainieri, Barnett, Valdero, Unipan, & Oskamp, 1997), calling into question the scale’s utility.”
• Testing the new ecological paradigm scale: Turkish case (2009, background): “Some researchers have used the NEP scale in its original and complete form (Lalonde and Jackson, 2002; Noe and Snow, 1990).”
• Early-Life Outdoor Experiences and an Individual's Environmental Attitudes (2005, background): “Lalonde and Jackson (2002) suggested that the NEP scale provided two important benefits.”