Freebase QA: Information Extraction or Semantic Parsing?

By Xuchen Yao, Jonathan Berant, Benjamin Van Durme. 2014

57 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We contrast two seemingly distinct approaches to the task of question answering (QA) using Freebase: one based on information extraction techniques, the other on semantic parsing. Results over the same test-set were collected from two state-ofthe-art, open-source systems, then analyzed in consultation with those systems’ creators. We conclude that the differences between these technologies, both in task performance, and in how they get there, is not significant. This suggests that the semantic parsing community should target answering more compositional open-domain questions that are beyond the reach of more direct information extraction methods.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Percy Liang
  3. Caiming Xiong
  4. Jianfeng Gao
  5. Richard Socher
  6. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  7. Graham Neubig
  8. Jason Aaron Edward Weston

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Richard Socher
  3. Caiming Xiong
  4. Percy Liang
  5. Jianfeng Gao
  6. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  7. Jason Aaron Edward Weston
  8. Graham Neubig

Citations in the corpus