Partial costs of global climate change adaptation for the supply of raw industrial and municipal water: a methodology and application

By Philip J. Ward, Kenneth M. Strzepek, W. Pauw, Luke Brander, G. A. Hughes, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts. 2010

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Despite growing recognition of the importance of climate change adaptation, few global estimates of the costs involved are available for the water supply sector. We present a methodology for estimating partial global and regional adaptation costs for raw industrial and domestic water supply, for a limited number of adaptation strategies, and apply the method using results of two climate models. In this paper, adaptation costs are defined as those for providing enough raw water to meet future industrial and municipal water demand, based on country-level demand projections to 2050. We first estimate costs for a baseline scenario excluding climate change, and then additional climate change adaptation costs. Increased demand is assumed to be met through a combination of increased reservoir yield and alternative backstop measures. Under such controversial measures, we project global adaptation costs of $12 bn p.a., with 83–90% in developing countries; the highest costs are in Sub-Saharan Africa. Globally, adaptation costs are low compared to baseline costs ($73 bn p.a.), which supports the notion of mainstreaming climate change adaptation into broader policy aims. The method provides a tool for estimating broad costs at the global and regional scale; such information is of key importance in international negotiations.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Ocean Engineering, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b743cf1c1cbcc39e6921ff419df1833346f63560

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Ocean Engineering

In Water Science and Technology

Citations in the corpus

A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areas (2017, methodology): “These cost estimates were then adjusted for all other countries by applying construction index multipliers 48 (based on civil engineering construction costs) to account for differences in construction costs across countries 49 .”
Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity (2013, background): “Beek and Bierkens 2009, Van Beek et al 2011), and its extension for dynamic routing, DynRout (PCR-GLOBWBDynRout). Discharge arises from flood-wave propagation; in each cell the associated flood volume is stored in the channel or on the floodplain in case of overbank flooding. The suitability of thes”