SQuALITY: Building a Long-Document Summarization Dataset the Hard Way

By Alex Wang, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Angelica Chen, Jason Phang, Samuel R. Bowman. 2022

59 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Summarization datasets are often assembled either by scraping naturally occurring public-domain summaries—which are nearly always in difficult-to-work-with technical domains—or by using approximate heuristics to extract them from everyday text—which frequently yields unfaithful summaries. In this work, we turn to a slower but more straightforward approach to developing summarization benchmark data: We hire highly-qualified contractors to read stories and write original summaries from scratch. To amortize reading time, we collect five summaries per document, with the first giving an overview and the subsequent four addressing specific questions. We use this protocol to collect SQuALITY, a dataset of question-focused summaries built on the same public-domain short stories as the multiple-choice dataset QuALITY (Pang et al., 2021). Experiments with state-of-the-art summarization systems show that our dataset is challenging and that existing automatic evaluation metrics are weak indicators of quality.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Evaluation & Benchmarks, Summarization

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Sebastian Gehrmann
  2. Percy Liang
  3. Mohit Bansal
  4. Elizabeth Clark
  5. Yejin Choi
  6. Graham Neubig
  7. Caiming Xiong
  8. Ondrej Dusek

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Elizabeth Clark
  2. Sebastian Gehrmann
  3. Ondrej Dusek
  4. Percy Liang
  5. Jekaterina Novikova
  6. Craig Thomson
  7. Michael. White
  8. Faisal Ladhak

In Summarization

  1. Yixin Liu
  2. Dragomir R. Radev
  3. Joshua Maynez
  4. Esin Durmus
  5. Vitaly Nikolaev
  6. Faisal Ladhak
  7. Pengfei Liu
  8. Graham Neubig

Citations in the corpus