Measuring agreement in ordered rating scales.

By C. Eijk. 2001

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Political Science and International Relations, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b71c166e26f9deeac8f2be6fcc276db815a389d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. J. Beaman
2. Humberto Barreto
3. R. Michael Alvarez
4. Sara Dolnicar
5. Jerry J. Vaske
6. Jonathan Nagler
7. Lori B. Shelby

In Political Science and International Relations

1. J. Beaman
2. Humberto Barreto
3. R. Michael Alvarez
4. Sara Dolnicar
5. Jerry J. Vaske
6. Jonathan Nagler
7. Lori B. Shelby
8. Jonathan Michael Kropko

In Statistics and Probability

1. Lori B. Shelby
2. Jerry J. Vaske
3. J. Beaman
4. Humberto Barreto
5. R. Michael Alvarez
6. Sara Dolnicar
7. Jonathan Nagler
8. Mark D. Needham

Citations in the corpus

• An Extension and Further Validation of the Potential for Conflict Index (2010, methodology): “First, the original formulation of PCI (PCI 1 ) is introduced and related to other social science measures (eg, Tastle, Wierman, & Dumdum, 2005 ; Van der Eijk, 2001 ).”
• Asking Good Survey Questions (2013, background): “Yet, currently, commercial market research heavily relies on the pick-any answer format, which leads to substantial evasion by respondents while academics prefer ordinal answer formats (Van der Eijk 2001) which are prone to capturing response styles.”
• Party System Compactness: Measurement and Consequences (2004, background): “4Van Der Eijk (2001) offers an alternative measure of dispersion to the standard deviation, which he criticizes for measuring skew and dispersion. indicate that the voters are not spread out very much relative to the parties from which they choose.”