State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global periphery

By Philippe Norel. Brazilian Political Science Review, 2005

596 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b718ce050edc553afa7ed765831b363e2b1a258c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. Fubing Su
2. Cornel Ban
3. P. Žížalová
4. Ran Tao
5. J. Braithwaite
6. P. Pavlínek
7. S. Corbridge

In Economics and Econometrics

1. P. Žížalová
2. P. Pavlínek
3. Fubing Su
4. Cornel Ban
5. Ran Tao
6. J. Braithwaite
7. S. Corbridge

In Political Science and International Relations

1. P. Žížalová
2. Fubing Su
3. Cornel Ban
4. Ran Tao
5. J. Braithwaite
6. P. Pavlínek
7. S. Corbridge
8. Fulong Wu

Citations in the corpus

• Responsive regulation and developing economies (2006, background): “Empirical studies of developing states show great variation in state capacity (see, e.g., Evans, 1995; Kohli, 2004).”
• The China model withering? Institutional roots of China’s local developmentalism (2017, methodology): “This genealogy is discernible in some key features defined by the developmental state literature (Haggard, 1990; Johnson, 1982; Kohli, 2004).”
• The (im)possibility of development studies (2007, background): “57 Important recent contributions have come from Dasgupta (2001), Firebaugh (2003), Kohli (2004) , Rodrik (2006), Rodrik et al . (2004), Sachs et al . (2001), Stern et al . (2005), Wade (2004) and Wolf 2005 [2004], among others.”
• Linkages and spillovers in global production networks: firm-level analysis of the Czech automotive industry (2016, background): “Absorptive capacity is thus considered to be crucial for the ability of domestic firms to benefit from FDI (Ernst and Kim, 2002; Kohli, 2004; Meyer, 2004) and upgrade their production and products or services to meet buyers’ requirements (Dunning and Lundan, 2008).”
• Brazil's liberal neo-developmentalism: New paradigm or edited orthodoxy? (2013, background): “31 For a review of the importance of tax failures in Brazil’s ‘old’ developmentalism see Kohli (2004).”
• Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies (2015, unknown): “Hence, we draw on existing analyses of the state–society relationship in developing countries (Migdal, 2001) and of the role of the state in fostering industrial and economic development (Amsden, 1989; Evans, 1995; Haggard, 1990; Kohli, 2004; Wade, 1990).”