Control of Fast-Reaching Movements by Muscle Synergy Combinations

By Andrea d'Avella, Alessandro Portone, Laure Fernandez, Francesco Lacquaniti. Journal of Neuroscience, 2006

715 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How the CNS selects the appropriate muscle patterns to achieve a behavioral goal is an open question. To gain insight into this process, we characterized the spatiotemporal organization of the muscle patterns for fast-reaching movements. We recorded electromyographic activity from up to 19 shoulder and arm muscles during point-to-point movements between a central location and 8 peripheral targets in each of 2 vertical planes. We used an optimization algorithm to identify a set of time-varying muscle synergies, i.e., the coordinated activations of groups of muscles with specific time-varying profiles. For each one of nine subjects, we extracted four or five synergies whose combinations, after scaling in amplitude and shifting in time each synergy independently for each movement condition, explained 73–82% of the data variation. We then tested whether these synergies could reconstruct the muscle patterns for point-to-point movements with different loads or forearm postures and for reversal and via-point movements. We found that reconstruction accuracy remained high, indicating generalization across these conditions. Finally, the synergy amplitude coefficients were directionally tuned according to a cosine function with a preferred direction that showed a smaller variability with changes of load, posture, and endpoint than the preferred direction of individual muscles. Thus the complex spatiotemporal characteristics of the muscles patterns for reaching were captured by the combinations of a small number of components, suggesting that the mechanisms involved in the generation of the muscle patterns exploit this low dimensionality to simplify control.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b707760f99fee06076586f022184414525ef3aa9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Stacie A. Chvatal
  2. Lena H. Ting
  3. Pierre-Yves Oudeyer
  4. Kevin B. Englehart
  5. Francesco Lacquaniti
  6. Adrien Baranes
  7. Yuri P. Ivanenko
  8. Philip A. Parker

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Pierre-Yves Oudeyer
  2. Adrien Baranes
  3. Stacie A. Chvatal
  4. Frederic Kaplan
  5. Lena H. Ting
  6. Kevin B. Englehart
  7. Francesco Lacquaniti
  8. Jörn Diedrichsen

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

  1. Stacie A. Chvatal
  2. Lena H. Ting
  3. Francesco Lacquaniti
  4. Yuri P. Ivanenko
  5. D. M. Wolpert

Citations in the corpus